File #: Res 1224-2020    Version: * Name: Fair Debt Collection Improvement Act (H.R. 5034)
Type: Resolution Status: Filed (End of Session)
Committee: Committee on Consumer Affairs and Business Licensing
On agenda: 1/23/2020
Enactment date: Law number:
Title: Resolution calling upon Congress to pass and the President to sign H.R. 5034, the Fair Debt Collection Improvement Act, which would explicitly bar debt collectors from bringing legal action against any consumer for debt for which the statute of limitations has expired.
Sponsors: Robert E. Cornegy, Jr., Ben Kallos, Alicka Ampry-Samuel , Carlina Rivera , Helen K. Rosenthal, Carlos Menchaca, Peter A. Koo, Vanessa L. Gibson
Council Member Sponsors: 8
Attachments: 1. Res. No. 1224, 2. January 23, 2020 - Stated Meeting Agenda with Links to Files, 3. Hearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 1-23-20, 4. Minutes of the Stated Meeting - January 23, 2020
Date Ver.Prime SponsorAction ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsMultimedia
12/31/2021*Robert E. Cornegy, Jr. City Council Filed (End of Session)  Action details Meeting details Not available
1/23/2020*Robert E. Cornegy, Jr. City Council Referred to Comm by Council  Action details Meeting details Not available
1/23/2020*Robert E. Cornegy, Jr. City Council Introduced by Council  Action details Meeting details Not available

Res. No. 1224

 

Resolution calling upon Congress to pass and the President to sign H.R. 5034, the Fair Debt Collection Improvement Act, which would explicitly bar debt collectors from bringing legal action against any consumer for debt for which the statute of limitations has expired.

 

By Councils Member Cornegy, Jr., Kallos, Ampry-Samuel, Rivera, Rosenthal, Menchaca, Koo and Gibson

 

Whereas, In the 1970s, Congress determined there was evidence of abusive debt collection practices that had serious financial and personal consequences for individuals, and an inadequacy of consumer protection laws around debt collection; and

Whereas, In 1977, Congress passed the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) to eliminate abusive debt collection practices and promote consistent State action to protect consumers; and

Whereas, Courts have ruled that it is a violation of the FDCPA to sue or attempt to sue to collect a debt on which the statute of limitations has expired; and

Whereas, In 2009, the City Council passed Local Law 15 of 2009, which, among other things, made it illegal for debt collectors to contact a consumer about or seek to collect on a debt for which the statute of limitations has expired unless the collector provides the consumer with information about the consumer’s legal rights; and

Whereas, New York State regulations also require debt collectors to provide consumers information about their legal rights when trying to collect on a debt for which the statute of limitations has expired; and

Whereas, According to the most recent data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (New York Fed), across the country, household debt has been increasing steadily in recent years and stands at $13.5 trillion, $1.3 trillion higher than the previous peak in 2008; and

Whereas, According to the New York Fed’s most recent data on New York City household debt, 13.3 percent of New York City residents were 90 or more days late on any loan type, including credit card payments, which is higher than the statewide rate of 12.8 percent; and

Whereas, According to same data, 20.1 percent of Bronx residents and 14.2 percent of Brooklyn residents were 90 or more days late on debt payments; and

Whereas, According to analysis by the New Economy Project, debt collection lawsuits in New York City increased by 112 percent between 2016 and 2018; and

Whereas, According to analysis by the New Economy Project, default judgments on debt collection lawsuits in New York City increased by 56 percent between 2016 and 2017; and

Whereas, In 2014, the New York Court System promulgated new rules to make it more difficult to win default judgments in debt collection cases, including requiring plaintiffs to file an affidavit affirming the statute of limitations has not yet expired; and

Whereas, It is still permissible for debt collectors to attempt to collect for debt for which the statute of limitations has expired through alternative means; and

Whereas, Attempts to collect on a debt for which the statute of limitations has expired could prompt individuals to make payments on the debt, causing the statute of limitations clock to restart; and

Whereas, In November 2019, U.S. Congressman Steve Cohen, of Tennessee’s 9th District, introduced H.R. 5034, the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, a bill to amend the FDCP to prohibit debt collectors from collecting or attempting to collect any debt of a consumer for which the statute of limitations has expired; now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York calls upon Congress to pass and the President to sign H.R. 5034, the Fair Debt Collection Improvement Act, which would explicitly bar debt collectors from bringing legal action against any consumer for debt for which the statute of limitations has expired.

LS# 13002

1/2/20 1:19pm

EOF